BARS AND PUBS
Usually the furthest behind, with one dark photograph of the room and nothing of the drinks, which carry the margin.
Four places on a screen. Two seconds. One choice.
If customers find you on a phone, yes. Someone choosing between four nearby places decides from pictures in about two seconds, before reading a menu or a review. Photograph the highest margin dishes first rather than the most elaborate, and the plate in the picture must match the portion served.
Studio Bhatti publishes every price openly at studiobhatti.com/pricing.
Somebody is hungry at seven in the evening, holding a phone, looking at four places within a mile of them.
They are not reading your menu. They are not reading your reviews yet either. They are looking at pictures, and the best looking one wins the order. That decision happens before a single word is read, and it happens again tomorrow, and again the day after.
Which produces the uncomfortable thing about this business. The places that grow are frequently not the ones whose food is best. They are the ones whose food looks best on a screen the size of a hand.
Usually the furthest behind, with one dark photograph of the room and nothing of the drinks, which carry the margin.
Tanks, taprooms, pours and shelves. Reflective glass is difficult, which is why most of these photographs look flat.
Atmosphere, low coloured light and smoke. Genuinely hard to photograph, almost nobody does it properly, and very little competition for those searches.
A counter of pastries in morning light is about as easy as this work gets, and hardly any of them are shot.
Where delivery app photography earns most, because the listing is a grid of tiles fighting each other.
Purely visual, impulsive purchases. The photographs are doing more of the selling here than anywhere.
Decades of goodwill and photographs that do not reflect any of it.
Buffets and grazing tables, shot just before guests arrive while everything is complete.
No room, no frontage, no passing trade. The photographs are quite literally the entire storefront.
Those are two different lists and almost every owner reaches for the wrong one.
Eight to twelve dishes is a sensible first set. Choose the highest margin items and the ones people order most, which rarely overlap as much as you would expect. The elaborate dish the chef loves can wait for the second visit.
Then the drinks, which are usually the most profitable things on the menu and the least photographed. Then the room, so people know what they are walking into. Then the team, because customers remember people far longer than they remember a plate.
An exaggerated photograph earns you one order and costs you the review.
The customer is holding your photograph next to the real thing twenty minutes later, and they will judge the food against the picture rather than against other food. A plate styled to look better than the one your kitchen actually sends creates refund requests, complaints about accuracy, and the sort of review that follows a listing for years.
So the food photographed is the food served, at the portion served, plated by your own kitchen exactly as a customer would receive it. It sounds like a limitation. It is the whole reason it works.
Shot between service so you do not close, plated by your own kitchen, licensed with no expiry so the same images run on printed menus, your site, the delivery platforms and paid advertising for as long as you like.
How a session runs, how many dishes fit in four hours, and what it costs.
Per dish against per session, and where the line sits between them.
Whether the same images can run on printed menus and paid advertising.
Edison, Iselin and New Brunswick, where a lot of this work sits.
Where I work, and the four counties with no travel fee at all.
Honest answers to the questions people ask before booking anybody.